Unveiling the Dynamics of Electoral Bonds in India
The issue of electoral bonds gained attention following the Supreme Court's decision to invalidate the government's scheme.The court ruled that the anonymity provision violated the Right to Information under act Article 19(A) of the Constitution.
On February 15, 2024, the Supreme Court, comprised of a seven-member bench led by the Chief Justice, delivered a unanimous verdict declaring electoral bonds unconstitutional. The ruling called for an immediate cessation of the electoral bond system, citing violations of the Right to Information Act under Article 19(A) of the Constitution. The court highlighted concerns regarding transparency, noting that electoral bonds obscure the identities of corporate donors to political parties, thereby impeding voters' access to vital information on political funding. This lack of transparency, the court argued, undermines the electorate's ability to make informed voting decisions.
The verdict underscores broader apprehensions surrounding significant donations to political parties, raising questions about the potential for undue influence and fairness in electoral processes. Critics argue that the influx of financial resources may overshadow the importance of policy considerations in shaping democratic outcomes.
The Need for an Electoral Bond
The Union Government introduced the electoral bond scheme on June 17, 2017. This scheme serves as a financial tool during election campaigns, as the costs of campaigning have become increasingly expensive, ranging from 95 lakh to 5 crore. Donations for electoral bonds can be made starting from `1,000, `10,000, `1,00,000, '10,00,000, and `1,00,00,000 which can be purchased at the specified branches of the State Bank of India (SBI). In order to contest an election, a substantial amount of money is required not only for campaigns and advertisements, but also for organizing parties, running the office, and mobilizing support.
Impact on political funding
The introduction of electoral bonds has raised concerns about the lack of transparency and accountability in political funding. The anonymity provided by these bonds has made it difficult to track the sources of political donations, potentially opening avenues for misuse of funds and a lack of transparency in political financing.
Here are the reasons that economists are concerned about the electoral bond:
According to experts, an exaggerated amount of political funding may cause the route of black money to significantly influence the policies and decisions of elected officials, which shapes the direction of governance and public interest.
One of the biggest disadvantages of corporate funding is the use of fake companies to funnel black money.According to retired professor Arun Kumar of Delhi Jawaharlal, he mentioned in an interview that India's GDP should not fall below 3.5. And India needs at least 62% GDP to survive the Indian economy. The existence of black money, which may pass through electoral bonds, may bring dishonest people and parties to power.
Local media uncovers the troubling practice of political parties bribing voters with cash during elections, exposing the erosion of democratic values. These reports highlight the urgent need for transparency and accountability in electoral processes. By bringing attention to such misconduct, the media advocates for the preservation of democratic integrity, urging authorities to take swift action against those involved in electoral corruption.
Substantial financial contributions from corporations could potentially influence politicians. Depending on the results, politicians may prioritize the interests of these major donors, even if it comes to the detriment of regular citizens. Consequently, this could result in legislation and choices that favor corporations rather than what is truly beneficial for the public.
The central query revolves around how entities operating at a net zero profit margin can afford such substantial donations. This has sparked debates regarding the transparency and legitimacy of these financial transactions, particularly in the context of political influence and accountability.
Below is a compilation of companies that have donated electoral bonds with either no profits or profits below zero during the period of 2017–2023. Take a look at the list!
Comments
Post a Comment